Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28B406A03 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98686 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 18:09:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98520 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 18:09:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98512 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 18:09:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:09:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:09:02 +0000 Received: by ywg8 with SMTP id 8so32432ywg.6 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:08:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5VVCZAXCEZPqc6OfjUE0k374mEEYZ5/JcK9/hchyDEM=; b=csmeU1pSGnJoK+p/2dqItZThgmniWotylfSg6jjzlP1/TWJuM7LKNlEGBPwB+4Bh9s 9QLRLGRll87AX1rvr6Lw042tNZKV9HH6MeuZCdkjnY15m+c54XVIGNwm0ScEcATD1s3U 9NPWXsuOMPNamyKbY+3mT/CLG8oFkFrf4uBhs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iBzDVoeWhxWJC1inrOlSY7P7p4SPwiM5DawxsRNX6QmAqPli+25APhTwxEr5QFaf/s zAFEJ06uLNXBpfweRdewD6edttuZh8iVS2JK/SjihQjke0Fl25kb+VvsxDHd1xWVWlZU hHq6GEPZjBLNxFDK4ILVPazZarx9Rh6NJkt0w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.114.17 with SMTP id m17mr6272677ybc.315.1306951722031; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.146.83.18 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:08:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com> References: <4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:08:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal From: Jochen Wiedmann To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I view this proposal very critical. IMO, OpenOffice@Apache would be a dead end: - There is an existing community over at LibreOffice. So what good does it, to build a second community here? - The afore mentioned community was built exactly, because the initiators of the current proposal have been unable to hold the community. Why should they do any better, if the code base where moved to Apache? - While LibreOffice could take over any ASL'ed code, the opposite wouldn't be true. In other words, LibreOffice would have a very clear advantage that could never be eliminated as long as the project where ASL'ed. Jochen -- I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org