Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C7866A6B for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49295 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:12:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49148 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49140 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 01:12:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:12:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gstein@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:12:50 +0000 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so3124486iwn.6 for ; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:12:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z00ztCcmR1c4Hq71Rln6bkc4d6PCKtpFNlrnpHlIDK4=; b=DBz35PwbNr1PBhlqq5Q4xVoaIBMiEgdw4V5YCBc6BWaKaEihKeGtWMlb1wG+Zkj3jH jYZFYUxffLAR/HE2TxTnKWyttQi68XwWXNrIhLld93DXQUKlA5nAA7l+dwRBvXuhjTyA RAhy4xR+HVGXpuiVFHwPAAVpUt+G4y9a373t8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kSToFkC023ChoBBAPfukwo5Ks+k+yFengQ5nUQdGHmO+QTYjL+IKESPf618QnCEMUd Wb9r81qxprEtu4StxNvdg80t2h5Uv2U/WVgAj7nQN5eUpt1ImH+lgA5b0F0nNtviu10G 7fmI0M08WjFgCd0C0m7RrhVsj0x+Nj99b91So= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.217.138 with SMTP id hm10mr7802401icb.205.1307322749646; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.6.13 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 18:12:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DEC276E.9050608@the-martin-byrd.net> References: <4DEC276E.9050608@the-martin-byrd.net> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 21:12:29 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal From: Greg Stein To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 21:03, Andy Brown wrote: > Greg Stein wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 20:07, Alexandro Colorado >> =A0wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Greg Stein =A0wrote: >>> >>>> I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested >>>> mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. >>>> >>>> This is what I entered into the wiki: >>>> ---- >>>> The following mailing lists: >>>> >>>> oo-dev@incubator.apache.org - for developer discussions >>>> oo-commits@incubator.apache.org - for Subversion commit messages >>>> oo-issues@incubator.apache.org - for JIRA change notifications >>>> oo-notifications@incubator.apache.org - for continuous build/test >>>> notifications >>>> >>>> Note: a users mailing is not being requested at this time. It is >>>> anticipated that users will interact with the community through >>>> existing OpenOffice.org systems. >>> >>> OpenOffice.org official contaction is 'OOo' not 'oo' I think is enough >>> time >>> to correct these mailing lists. I wrote a more lenghty email but I thin= k >>> the >>> discussions should be better understood by Apache admins. >> >> The mailing lists haven't been constructed yet. We can easily change >> the request to ooo-*. I was just trying to keep the names short :-) >> >> Opinions, people? Should they be "oo-*" or "ooo-*"? (the former could >> work if we call it "Apache OpenOffice") >> >> Cheers, >> -g > > I have to agree with Alexandro on this. =A0The OpenOffice.org (OOo or ooo= ) has > long be established and it will be very confusing to users to change now. > =A0For internal use the oo-* may work but feel that it maybe best to use = ooo-* > as new people come aboard. =A0Even the "Apache OpenOffice" will cause > confusion. I just went to update the wiki to switch to the ooo- convention, and somebody beat me to it :-D My intent was to keep it as short as possible, but precedent is better. Thanks, -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org