Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53BA741F0 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 23:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60268 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 23:49:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 60107 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 23:49:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 60099 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 23:49:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:49:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of keithcu@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.175] (HELO mail-gx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.161.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:49:41 +0000 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so935285gxk.6 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:49:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JIrkNcO42JBLbcF/acGEIGgycC3EvY8fgy2sp6n4M3c=; b=GZFvuf/subQa12Rgt5D2VwbUzyF5lRPDkIPp/MARoipHHz2aYomKwTME++srCfYEI/ rZ2efQR6DlO79lkMAQPBtxKfblFDu69sAgAnNMi+nT1kiHPhYgiU/nDM609PrVu9YN0N xaADvh2rmI1FIzGO80Mo0qAl4XxqKzrxk55jE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JaZpF4atNd6fp/77bqfModsD+O9lPDZs1lVqBEjzhVLJ2+wKzw32OcZCnKlQn+OdH0 rCy7t4U0woaILK/fQd/l+no4aggGKjJkLwCvr7EDe/3cdI2Ec1IHbD+/IGs2atvZj0Yn x0XDIKcWF4r4Ugyx6Gxzjkv9lLt+dxw9IIwLg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.186.40 with SMTP id v28mr6903125yhm.381.1307404160331; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.102.170 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:49:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DED5F4F.6030203@apache.org> References: <7BAEC795-6BC4-423B-9E5F-DF43478BE21B@webmink.com> <4DED5F4F.6030203@apache.org> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:49:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org Summit Proposal From: Keith Curtis To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 06/06/2011 19:17, Danese Cooper wrote: >> >> Well...we were thinking about adding a track at >> http://www.transfersummit.com/BarCamp >> >> which is in Europe...at least. > > Actually there are two separate events we are considering here, a Barcamp > and the conference itself. I'm talking to the organisers now. > > (it seems with all the possibles we will get a certainty pretty quickly) > Those conferences are weeks away. If this project is given life, there will then be less reason for changes to the current plan that could improve the situation. It appears that "more discussion" is the only proposal change offered so far. "We'll work out these issues later. It is just some minor details. Everyone will just work in whatever codebase and license they prefer. We are all friends, right?" In case it got lost in the flurry, here is the link to a piece of my book that gives a Debian / Ubuntu case study on forks: http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?page_id=558. Kind regards, -Keith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org