Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 76.96.27.211 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of jim@jagunet.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: Proposal for OpenOffice Incubator strategy
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DE8F924.4020605@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:35:02 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9A697CF9-8310-4D60-B7FC-3761A86446AE@jaguNET.com>
References: <00EDD8E7-3429-486E-8E1A-7FBA310A1408@webmink.com>
 <OFB8DCDD55.52205FC4-ON852578A4.0002933E-852578A4.0007DF77@lotus.com>
 <1307109931.13558.228.camel@lenovo-w500>
 <A0624B38-6F03-408C-8226-8E148C1D9F6A@jaguNET.com>
 <BANLkTinyEFZv=h3JWMmc4eBgFGBJEyoR9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DE8F924.4020605@apache.org>
To: general@incubator.apache.org


On Jun 3, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:

> On 03/06/2011 16:00, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> Stupid question time: If TDF already has the *build* infrastructure,
>>> then isn't *that* a clear choice of where at least some level of
>>> cooperation can occur.
>>>=20
>>> After all, the ASF provides source... the TDF could provide
>>> the builds?? (but that's not all, of course)...
>>=20
>> what a fantastic idea!
>> Nothing to add at the moment, but when I read it, I knew this might =
be
>> a very good direction.
>=20
> Please see Simon Phipps' email earlier today that contained a very =
similar suggestion with some more detail, it would be nice to bring =
these two threads together.
>=20

Simon's suggestion folded in the concept of TDF's "open repository"
as a factor, which confuses things most awkwardly.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org