Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andy@the-martin-byrd.net
 designates 204.16.46.7 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4DF284B1.8040709@the-martin-byrd.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:55:13 -0700
From: Andy Brown <andy@the-martin-byrd.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Comment:  Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
References: <4DF24024.2040709@intertwingly.net>	<istug0$m0v$1@dough.gmane.org>
 <BANLkTikCgL7qrepGvSZPVJqE1mppwP4gew@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikCgL7qrepGvSZPVJqE1mppwP4gew@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Keith Curtis wrote:
> -1
>
> My list of 44 reasons is here:
> http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?p=2567
>
> To boil it down to one: this plan as announced had several big flaws, and
> they still exist.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Keith
>
> P.S. I don't see many from LibreOffice voting against this proposal, so I
> joined again to vote on their behalf.
>
> P.P.S. Hopefully more register their votes on this important matter like
> good netizens. The cheapest thing now is to vote "no" so we can make a
> better plan.
>

According to your blog, linked above, your quite willing for those that 
may not support LibreOffice to just go home?  And lose the talent to 
that can help this grow even bigger.

Andy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org