Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFA52467E for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 06:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58811 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 06:29:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58664 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 06:29:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58656 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 06:29:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 06:29:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.97.42.2] (HELO lilly.ping.de) (83.97.42.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 06:29:03 +0000 Received: (qmail 18433 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2011 06:28:42 -0000 Received: (ofmipd 85.22.13.252); 6 Jun 2011 06:28:20 -0000 Date: 6 Jun 2011 08:28:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4DEC739A.2050503@ping.de> From: "Andreas Kuckartz" To: general@incubator.apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110510 Icedove/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Legal concern: Are we getting to close ot a "division of markets" conversation? References: <316692.4767.qm@web161429.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <314091.20908.qm@web161406.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 06.06.2011 03:56, schrieb robert_weir@us.ibm.com: > There are limits to what competitors can do to divide markets among themselves. IANL, of > course, but this smells very bad, and I suggest we don't broach the topic > again, unless cleared by ASF Legal Affairs. I myself will withdraw from > this list if the topic comes up again, pending review by IBM Legal. In that case maybe it would be a good idea to ask IBM Legal now and let those know about the result who will vote about the incubation proposal, because your mail suggests that people working for IBM will potentially sabotage reasonable collaboration with TDF / LO during incubation. Cheers, Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org