Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB3266C00 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72412 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:41:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72190 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:41:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72182 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 01:41:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:41:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.208.4.194] (HELO mout.perfora.net) (74.208.4.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:41:28 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.104] (209-6-122-136.c3-0.arl-ubr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcn.com [209.6.122.136]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LdpHv-1PmKkj0enb-00iAa7; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:41:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4DEC302A.7020401@shanecurcuru.org> Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:40:58 -0400 From: Shane Curcuru User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice: were are we now? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Eh/ycOpuGF81FRCLpNvnC2P3oy6SoNpJwzptCogSdfu FOf/90YCOYrc+GkIzMbzUujPSXs6OOj7CNvmNl24ES2rdJ82nV 69nWnUL6nPbMwPEvlNwGnltotNE1fDYr8hBxenCTN5RlvLpy2j ygsOxYs/DnS0vy3w1Nwn1TlD2S5Ry/BJMUFDFxB03yZSs0na1b ynf3V1vI92TB/zNOVEng3i8pJxjuGeZOmb47epoI4Q= At the risk of sounding naive, why do some people continue to believe that an Incubator list at Apache is a realistic way to get an answer about IBM's corporate strategy? I suppose given the community history it's certainly a controversial issue likely to get some sort of response, I just don't see it helping the Incubation process at all. - Shane, relishing a moment of irony robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote on 06/05/2011 07:58:17 > PM: > >> No, it was my point that that they only negative to TDF/OO was the >> license here: >> >> http://markmail.org/message/w5vtsa5nbarmnqxo >> >> But please do elaborate on why IBM prefers a new project here rather >> than contributing to TDF/OO - I am very interested to know. >> > > And Eris, the goddess of strive, engraved the golden apple "to the > fairest"... > > As stated before, I decline to be goaded into laying out the detailed > reasons, since that would be denigrating to TDF/LO and poison future > opportunities for collaboration. > > -Rob --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org