Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDEB84FE4 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36378 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:23:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36142 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:23:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36133 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 15:23:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:23:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 76.96.30.48 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jim@jagunet.com) Received: from [76.96.30.48] (HELO qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:23:16 +0000 Received: from omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.88]) by qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id r36M1g0051u4NiLA53NvKL; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:22:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.84.64]) by omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id r3Nq1g02B1PGofZ8h3Nugv; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:22:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Blondie's Parallel Lines... From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:22:49 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0F640D95-CE65-487B-B274-08F98545C500@jaguNET.com> References: <20110602000137.GA60771@devsys.jaguNET.com> <4DE6D6E9.8080609@apache.org> <4DE76850.2060905@documentfoundation.org> <2D234AC2-791A-4BD9-9B71-B93610164604@jaguNET.com> To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: >=20 > To answer Jim's email, I think that while OOo and LibreOffice don't = have to > be competitors, I would not necessarily want to decide why we should = split > development efforts. I 'm sure the Apache Foundation has experience in > dealing with Free and Open Source Software projects but I don't think = it > make sense to to split communities and give a specific role to each of = them. All I'm saying is that we have options available to us, options that up until a day or so ago, NO ONE in the OOo/LOo community had. No one. So let's take some time to look at them and discuss them ;) >=20 > I do have a question though. To me it's unclear whether the Openoffice > project has any real development ressources. I see so far one = developer and > Rob, who I know to be a distinguished engineer from IBM but who has = never > contributed code to OpenOffice, if I recall. I'm a bit surprised by = this as > TDF has now over 200 developers, paid and unpaid and I was under the > impression that this number was not deemed to be enough by IBM. The initial list has grown and I expect it to continue to; up until it was announced, no one new about it, so it was kinda impossible to get a more comprehensive list. Now that people do know about it, people are signing on.= --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org