Oh completely agreed there. A lot of this hot-air
is quite premature. Geronimo was nothing other than
a JBoss fork and we had no problems entertaining that
resolution, I see no major concerns for OOo other than
volunteer resources signed up for the task.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, June 3, 2011 2:12:03 PM
> Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal: Splitting the
Community?
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Cmon Jim, he wrote a lengthy monologue which spelled
> > out his position. As I read it, we could license
> > the OpenOffice trademark to the Document Foundation
> > for, as Simon put it, "business as usual" distributions.
> > If we wanted to we could specify a time/date/event
> > upon which that license terminates, and the "new"
> > stuff going on at the ASF would be distributing code
> > under the mark.
>
> Just remember, we haven't yet even voted on whether or not to accept
> the podling.
>
> These are decisions the podling should be making.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|