incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Blondie's Parallel Lines... numerically ...
Date Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:22:06 GMT
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:07 PM,  <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@novell.com> wrote on 06/02/2011 08:57:27 PM:
>
>>
>> -    $scripts_dir/merge-log -p LIBREOFFICE_CREATE.. >$outdir/all-lo.log
>> +    $scripts_dir/merge-log --all --since='2011-01-03'
>>$outdir/all-lo.log
>>
>>    Show 'active' contributors by affiliation - ie. at least one patch
>> contributed in the last six months like this:
>>
>> Employers with the most hackers (total 214)
>> (Unknown)                  138 (64.5%)
>> Oracle                      45 (21.0%)
>> Novell                      18 (8.4%)
>> Known contributors           7 (3.3%)
>> Canonical                    4 (1.9%)
>> Redhat                       2 (0.9%)
>>
>
> If I'm reading this correctly, you're quoting the Oracle developers as
> being contributors to LibreOffice?  That is not particularly useful for
> project planning purposes.  Perhaps the core count for Oracle is closer to
> the mark, if we extract only that out.

You are not reading this correctly, but more importantly the point is
that this contradict your claim earlier:

On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:34 -0400, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
> When I check the commit logs for LibreOffice and apply the Apache
> criteria for what defines an "active" participant (a commit within
> the last 6 months), I see only 54 names.

Everybody is entitled to their own opinions... but not their own facts.

Norbert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message