incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Lynch <ianrly...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?
Date Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:46:21 GMT
On 6 June 2011 16:39, Richard S. Hall <heavy@ungoverned.org> wrote:

> On 6/6/11 11:26, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Richard S. Hall<heavy@ungoverned.org>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/6/11 10:41, Manfred A. Reiter wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Richard, *
>>>>
>>>> 2011/6/6 Richard S. Hall<heavy@ungoverned.org>
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/6/11 2:48, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/5/11 11:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/6/2011 1:06 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Phil Steitz<phil.steitz@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  [...]
>>>>
>>>>  Disclaimer: I work for Oracle, but certainly don't speak for them and I
>>>>> knew nothing about this other than what i've read on these mailing
>>>>> lists...
>>>>>
>>>>> However, it seems like we have lost sight of the fact that TDF split
>>>>> the
>>>>> community from OOo. Sure, Oracle is the perceived villain and TDF the
>>>>> perceived good guy, but it doesn't change the fact that OOo created the
>>>>> community in the first place.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Fact: Your employer provoked the split, by a absolute
>>>> "non-communication" on the existing mailinglist.
>>>> Now, to say that TDF has split the Communtiy is dishonest!
>>>>
>>> Forking splits communities. Whether you feel you had a justified reason
>>> for
>>> doing so does not change this fact. I am not weighing in on whether it is
>>> right or wrong in this case, since I think that is immaterial to where we
>>> are now.
>>>
>>>  That's an example of denial. I do not see a conductive environment here
>> if such attitudes are tolerated.
>>
>>  I am only going by the "facts" as presented on the various Apache mailing
>>> lists. If it is true that TDF was engaged by Oracle/IBM before the Apache
>>> proposal, but failed to come to terms, then I cannot see how one can
>>> claim
>>> that the Apache proposal was merely an attempt to split the community.
>>>
>>>  You should read more about free and open-source software, from diverse
>> sources.
>> Get a lwn.net subscription.
>>
>> Similar example, there was XFree86 long time ago that behaved just
>> like the Oracle developers.
>> Then, it was forked into X.Org and everyone moved to X.Org.
>> XFree86 is a distant memory.
>>
>>
> Ok, forget the first part of what I originally said, since it doesn't
> really matter and apparently it prevents any discussion of the second
> part...
>
> The second part was, was TDF actually engaged and failed to come to terms
> or not? That is what I've read, so I accepted this as true.
>
> If so, do you actually believe the Apache proposal is just a stick in the
> eye of the TDF by Oracle/IBM because they were angry they couldn't come to
> terms? Or do you believe that because they couldn't come to terms they
> created this proposal to form their own community of like-minded people?
>
> I would have to assume the latter, not the former.
>

And the natural extension is that if there is no home for the OOo code with
Apache where will it end up? That scenario is not without risk either.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message