incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com>
Subject Re: Apache OpenOffice.org Incubator Proposal: Collaboration with TDF/LO
Date Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:20:32 GMT
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Simon Phipps <simon@webmink.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM, dsh <daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Besides that, I was asking myself why Rob is the only one who could
> >> > add such a tone to the proposal? If there would be consensus that open
> >> > and proactive collaboration with other parties is important it's up to
> >> > the community to add such a tone to the proposal.
> >> >
> >> > What do you think?
> >>
> >> The reason it is a wiki is exactly for this reason.  Go for it!
> >
> > What are the exact rules, Sam? Those of us who aren't insiders will be
> very
> > reticent indeed about editing.
>
> Rules?  :-)
>
> From http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html :
>
> "The incoming community needs to work together before presenting this
> proposal to the incubator. Think about and discuss future goals and
> the reasons for coming to Apache. Feel free to ask questions on list."
>

Got any special rules for where the incoming community is already divided?
:-)


> As long as people are constructive and working together, there will be
> no interference.  If it turns out that there are groups with multiple
> visions, we can split this page into separate proposals.  Defacement
> of the proposal will be quickly reverted.
>

So to be clear, the wiki page for the OOo proposal is open for anyone to
edit and not just Apache members or the project's proposers.

S.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message