incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Lynch <ianrly...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OpenOffice.org: Question to IBM regarding license of Lotus Symphony
Date Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:39:29 GMT
On 4 June 2011 13:30, Cor Nouws <oolst@nouenoff.nl> wrote:

> Sam Ruby wrote (04-06-11 13:35)
>
>  On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Andreas Kuckartz<A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
>>  wrote:
>>
>
>  If yes: which licenses would IBM be willing to consider ?
>>>
>>
>> Is there any reason to believe that the Apache License, Version 2.0 is
>> not an appropriate choice in this situation?
>>
>
> Yes. As expressed by many on this list and elsewhere: the Apache license
> policy does not match for at least part of the LibreOffice project.
> So starting with finding a common ground first, rather than starting with
> the Apache model, would have been a better approach, IMO.
>

I'm not an expert in this but is seems to me that since you can derive a
copy left licensed product from an Apache licensed product but not the other
way round, it is in fact logical to start with Apache if both are to be
considered.

-- 
Ian

Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications
The Schools ITQ

www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940

You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message