incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Volker Merschmann <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] (was: RE: [VOTE] Accept for incubation)
Date Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:21:50 GMT
Hi Gavin,

2011/6/11 Gavin McDonald <>:
>> From: Volker Merschmann []
>> Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2011 6:49 PM
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept for incubation
>> Hi,
>> I am wearing my OOo-hat here, and this is my vote:
>> [  ] +1 Accept for incubation [  ] +0 Indifferent to
>> incubation [X ] -1 Reject for incubation
>> I have contributed to for several years and I doubt that
> the
>> project will find the needed resources at Apache.
> Please tell us what sort of 'resources' are you talking about, examples
> please, are
> these infrastructure resources? If so, as an infra person here at the ASF I
> would
> like some insight into what people think we don’t have or  cannot handle.
> I have been researching myself online and with other folks including OOo
> infra admins
> and so far I haven’t found anything to make me think that this cannot be
> done at
> an infrastructure level.
I think the technical part can be solved. Not easy, but possible.

But you should read about resources here:
That came from inside Apache, didn't it?

And additional from the OOo-side: Did you watch the development of as project and as product since the fork? In fact there
wasn't any, despite the fact that Oracle was still sponsoring. Even if
OOo@Apache will attract some people who hesitated to participitate
before, there will be not enough to continue OOo to meet it's fine

Apache can be proud as it got the grant, but I doubt that OOo will be
long-term pleasure.


Volker Merschmann
Member of The Document Foundation

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message