incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com>
Subject Re: "opportunity to reunite the related communities" Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal: Splitting the Community?
Date Fri, 03 Jun 2011 19:44:05 GMT
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:

>
> On Jun 3, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> > I am not even thinking of suggesting it, any more than I would dream of
> telling TDF they have to switch to another license. But I do believe there's
> a need to focus *in the proposal* on exactly how to sustain the consumer
> deliverable from Day One.
>
> Agreed. And that's why I suggested that that would be an
> excellent initial part of cooperation between the ASF and
> TDF, where they could provide the build/distribution.
>

Didn't I suggest that first?  :-)


>
> One main, significant difference between TDF and the ASF
> is that the ASF just releases source; TDF fills a *huge*
> and important part of the entire OOo end-user experience.
> I sincerely hope this is an easy to agree to.
>

I think it is for you and I, yes, but the proposal itself isn't there yet.
There's still no section discussing how the project will handle its
inherited end-user binary commitments or the consumer brand, especially on
Day One.  I suggest this needs addressing if ASF is to be able to
confidently +1 it.

S.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message