incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From dsh <daniel.hais...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Blondie's Parallel Lines...
Date Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:44:26 GMT
Rob,

IMHO "the project" is "on track" the community just needs to discuss
some more things and sort them out. It is just that I don't even think
it's required to provide proof-points based on "questionable"
analytics at this point in time. There is a saying in this regards "I
only believe in statistics that I doctored myself" and that's
certainly one reason why I feel suspicious about these kind of
analysis :)

Cheers
Daniel

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:18 PM,  <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> dsh <daniel.haischt@googlemail.com> wrote on 06/02/2011 04:05:38 PM:
>
>>
>> IMHO you should not discuss or question the LO community size
>> respective its vitality in any way at this place. That's certainly not
>> the scope of the OpenOffice Apache incubation proposal anyway. The
>
> I disagree.  The question was raised on the list whether this project was
> on track to have a sufficient number of developers to allow this project
> to thrive.  In my analysis I commented on two highly relevant comparable
> projects, estimating how many core developers they have.  IMHO, this is
> **highly** relevant.
>
> If you or anyone else would like to propose a different analysis leading
> to a different number, then I'd welcome as well.
>
> -Rob
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message