incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Frovarp <rfrov...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Droids 0.1-incubating RC2
Date Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:29:38 GMT
On 06/15/2011 08:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 June 2011 04:43, Richard Frovarp<rfrovarp@apache.org>  wrote:
>> Please vote on the release cndidate for Apache Droids Incubating, version
>> 0.1-incubating. I've received one binding IPMC +1 votes and 2 non-binding +1
>> votes.
>>
>> PPMC release vote thread:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-droids-dev/201106.mbox/%3C4DE7D6CC.8080302@apache.org%3E
>>
>> Source files:
>> http://people.apache.org/~rfrovarp/droids/
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-011/
>>
>> SVN source tag (r1127762):
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 3698A2B1):
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1
>
> There must be a disclaimer saying that the project is undergoing Incubation.
> This is normally in a DISCLAIMER file, which should be in SVN, source
> and binary archives.
>

Added.

> The website should also carry a prominent disclaimer, nromally at the
> start of the index page.
>

Will have someone work on that.

> The NOTICE file must only contain required notices, and only for items
> that are actually included in the release, not run-time dependencies
> that are downloaded by Maven.
>
> E.g. is JUnit included in the release? If not, remove the reference.
>
> Do not add any extraneous text to the Notice file - e.g explanations
> and headings - it should be as short as possible (but no shorter).
>

Done.

> The project name should be shown as "Apache Droids" in the Notice file(s).
>

Fixed as well.

> I think the above all need to be fixed before release.
>
> The source archive contents agree with SVN (apart from extra files
> generated by Maven).
> Sigs and hashes are OK; key is in public PGP repo.
> Contents of jar files look good; there are N&L files in the META-INF dir.
>
> The source and javadoc jar manifests could include the Specification entries.

I don't know that I completely understand this. I'm not too familiar 
with the manifest files, and adding specification into a search returns 
back the specs on the file format.

> It would be useful to include the Java source and target versions in
> the binary jar manifests.
>

Will do.

> The SVN properties don't appear to have been set on many of the source
> files, which suggests that some committers have not set up their SVN
> defaults correctly.
> (I'll raise a JIRA for correcting the properties)
>

Applied / fixed. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message