incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cor Nouws <oo...@nouenoff.nl>
Subject Re: OpenOffice.org: Question to IBM regarding license of Lotus Symphony
Date Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:47:09 GMT
Ian Lynch wrote (04-06-11 14:39)
> On 4 June 2011 13:30, Cor Nouws<oolst@nouenoff.nl>  wrote:
>
>> Sam Ruby wrote (04-06-11 13:35)
>>> Is there any reason to believe that the Apache License, Version 2.0 is
>>> not an appropriate choice in this situation?
>>>
>>
>> Yes. As expressed by many on this list and elsewhere: the Apache license
>> policy does not match for at least part of the LibreOffice project.
>> So starting with finding a common ground first, rather than starting with
>> the Apache model, would have been a better approach, IMO.
>>
>
> I'm not an expert in this but is seems to me that since you can derive a
> copy left licensed product from an Apache licensed product but not the other
> way round, it is in fact logical to start with Apache if both are to be
> considered.

No, those people will not join that project under Apache.

Cor

-- 
  - http://nl.libreoffice.org
  - giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation -


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message