incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com>
Subject RE: Remediation ...
Date Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:53:29 GMT

On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 14:27 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Ultimately with a suite of 8+ million lines, packed with obscure features,
> > and thousands of lines of change a day it is fairly easy to slip things in,
> > to the potential detriment of other users of the code.
> 
> Wait.  How is an IP remediation of "potential detriment of other users of
> the code"?  I can appreciate your concern over potential submarine patents
> -- we do have a clause to address that -- but how is REMOVAL of a problem
> a potential detriment?

	The removal is great, we want to do that too (though as a separation).
The problem is if it is done silently and in a way that is obscured. It
would be easy to hide the "what to remove" making it available only to
those using a verbatim Apache Office.

	This is what I want to avoid; I would like to winkle this information
out, publicly, to ensure that LibreOffice (and others: gnumeric, KOffice
etc.) can take advantage of it. Is that clearer ?

	HTH,

		Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message