Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of grobmeier@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=MiTwuPyumiaBGxbvgsCEa8iRXVXE7+iZJ6sqZdt9YlqNEpIrznTIR/UitP4YHn3W4R
         HqhfFWhr5/vgO+PDoRUQjkBV5OPkZM76SsLa94NjtZwALzwWt4vHUZJFfd0YKApfqGwf
         wXtPHznMXG/c2AP1CDgP4QSTa360FzQQOdObE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimpPbptJi-xrATDh3tn8=2QJ4NT7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTin-JHk-s=0gswk1JeWj1GCS0G8uVg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTimpPbptJi-xrATDh3tn8=2QJ4NT7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:05:37 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimUny2yXJaBgiuLcbpXxJbTWyGy=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OGNL Infrastructure questions
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> we could share MLs and also SVN (Sandbox
> would be nice, not?)

MLs are fine, b/c one would need to change address later, and
searching for pre-graduation threads is more easily.

For SVN I don't see a benefit. The repos can be moved with less effort
once component is graduated. I would like to avoid to get something
into the sandbox which is not cleared from legal perspective. What, if
OGNL fails in the incubator and we just forget to remove the code from
the sandbox? If its in the incubator part, it is like a tag
saying:"beware"

I would be +1 on user/dev ML but leave SVN in incubator
Is there a need to create a pmc ML for OGNL to discuss incubation
related matters?

Cheers

> What Incubator PMCs think about it?
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>> Below is a thread from the Commons Dev list in which I'm recommending
>> that OGNL use the commons dev mailing list and that the svn
>> permissions allow the ognl committers and the commons committers to
>> have read write access.
>>
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://commons.markmail.org/thread/ku3ouuilpiicb5is
>>
>> Is this a concern for anyone?
>>
>> OGNL's target is to graduate into Commons rather than to TLP, so
>> making it act like a TLP seems destined to cause problems.
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


--=20
http://www.grobmeier.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org