From general-return-28124-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Mar 17 10:50:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47889 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 10:49:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 10:49:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 44176 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 10:49:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43993 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 10:49:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26904 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 10:33:49 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [58.71.19.178] In-Reply-To: References: <1262154604.22721.1300082321032.JavaMail.root@cell.g2ix.net> <847535817.22733.1300082747290.JavaMail.root@cell.g2ix.net> <7364B750-A3F0-45B1-ACC8-D7AC27C512B1@apache.org> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:33:18 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release NPanday 1.3-incubating From: Adelita Padilla To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: sebb Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8ef298992c049eab307a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba6e8ef298992c049eab307a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All, We regret to inform you that we will not be pushing through with the 1.3-incubating release. We are going to address first the issues raised with the release, then do a 1.3.1-incubating release. Thanks, liit On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:58 PM, sebb wrote: > On 16 March 2011 09:40, Troy Howard wrote: > > Regarding: > >> I cannot read the tar.gz files with my normal tools (hexdump shows > >> that they are in RAR format), and the hashes have got spurious lines > >> in them which break automated checkers. > > > > Looks like you guys are a) building the release packages on Windows, > > and b) using Microsoft's FCIV tool to generate MD5 and SHA1 hashes. > > This is something I tried to do at first as well. > > > > To get a standard output for that, you should use the standard Unix > > tools... You can download gnu coreutils binaries compiled for Windows > > from here: > > > > http://s.apache.org/rV > > > > Install that package, and use the included md5.exe/sha1.exe programs > > to generate your checksums, and it will be exactly Apache's standard > > for that (instead of messing around with munging the output from > > FCIV).. Plus you get a bunch of other handy standard unix commandline > > apps without needingt to install cygwin... > > Given that the project currently uses Maven, would in not make more > sense to use Maven to create the archives and hashes (and sigs)? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --90e6ba6e8ef298992c049eab307a--