Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43572 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2011 16:03:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2011 16:03:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 60046 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 16:03:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59498 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 16:03:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58759 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2011 16:03:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 16:03:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of list@toolazydogs.com does not designate 74.125.83.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.175] (HELO mail-pv0-f175.google.com) (74.125.83.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 16:03:25 +0000 Received: by pvd12 with SMTP id 12so594093pvd.6 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:03:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.199.18 with SMTP id w18mr13192732wff.3.1296921782021; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:03:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.18.37.124] (dagmar.corp.linkedin.com [69.28.149.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x35sm2757403wfd.13.2011.02.05.08.02.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:03:00 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: Voting waiting period From: "Alan D. Cabrera" In-Reply-To: <3028227656224141417@unknownmsgid> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:02:57 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <2D129343-168F-4900-A4C9-AAE76240BA4C@toolazydogs.com> <25941_1296888513_4D4CF2C1_25941_279_1_4D4CF2C9.7010808@apache.org> <3028227656224141417@unknownmsgid> To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Makes sense to me. The voting document itself be updated I guess. Regards, Alan On Feb 5, 2011, at 5:56 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: > Yeah I agree with this. At MyFaces we typically way the 72 hours, but > for security things or master pom updates which prevent a built, we > often adopt "lazy consensus" type rule and fudge the timeframe with > enough community votes. > > I think it's important to keep things flexible because, as much as we > would like everything to fit the same rules, some communities need to > be a bit more dynamic and we need to trust the project PMC's and > members to do what's best for the project and community. > > 72 hours is a good suggestion, but it shouldn't be mandatory. > > My .02.. > > Scott > > On Feb 4, 2011, at 11:49 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: > >> On 02/04/2011 10:52 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>> >> >> Note the wording: "should". >> Sometimes 72 hours is just too long, especially >> for security related releases. In that (or any other >> special) case RM can call for a shorter, or even >> longer window. >> >> >> Regards >> -- >> ^TM >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org