Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80435 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2010 11:48:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Dec 2010 11:48:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 41434 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2010 11:48:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41046 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2010 11:48:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41034 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2010 11:48:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:48:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:47:53 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so8248242wyb.6 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:47:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.173.79 with SMTP id u57mr3146wel.40.1291290452564; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:47:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.69] (host86-144-199-12.range86-144.btcentralplus.com [86.144.199.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w41sm205870weq.32.2010.12.02.03.47.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:47:31 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Leo Simons To: "general@incubator.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: iPad Mail (7B500) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 7B500) Subject: Re: I think individuals need SGAs Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:48:15 +0000 References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey hey, I definitely understand the reasoning. Hmm. I think the way to look at = it is, "it depends, but do whatever is needed to allow apache liberal = rights to sublicense all the IP to it's users". The second way to look at it is that logic and legal stuff are not = always as closely connected as you might think...so I think this really = is something to run by legal-discuss / whoever designed the process = (Roy?), people like me just regurgitate what they learned before :) cheerio, Leo On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Benson Margulies = wrote: > I've been thinking about Leo's email of the other day, and I think > that my edit to the mentor page is not right and some guidance I've > delivered to podlings is not right. >=20 > I'd like to float my logic here and see how it gets shot at. >=20 > As Leo pointed out, the CCLA has a specific section for granting > rights to pre-existing IP. >=20 > The ICLA does not. It has no schedule. It talks about contributions. >=20 > When we import pre-existing code for a podling, it seems to me that it > is dubious to characterize this as an act of 'contribution' by the > historical authors, even if they are eagerly anticipating further > contributions to the code in the incubator. >=20 > Therefore, I think that I should edit my edit, and send new advice, to > the effect that all historical contributors need to be covered by > SGAs. Those could be in the form of SGA schedules or in the form of > individual SGAs. >=20 > --benson >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org