Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21340 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2010 21:37:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Nov 2010 21:37:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 95504 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2010 21:37:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95336 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2010 21:37:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95327 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2010 21:37:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:37:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [148.87.113.121] (HELO rcsinet10.oracle.com) (148.87.113.121) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:37:37 +0000 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com (acsinet15.oracle.com [141.146.126.227]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id oARLbE37030200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:37:15 GMT Received: from acsmt353.oracle.com (acsmt353.oracle.com [141.146.40.153]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id oARLbD4V025886 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:37:13 GMT Received: from abhmt003.oracle.com by acsmt354.oracle.com with ESMTP id 809731311290893767; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:36:07 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.12] (/69.181.138.81) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:36:07 -0800 Message-Id: <2A638CB9-5F9C-4956-9C56-E585DBBCBDB2@oracle.com> From: Craig L Russell To: general@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Clarification about SGA versus CCLA Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:36:05 -0800 References: <6F72DCA6-02A0-4533-A7CE-4D44B8516A79@oracle.com> <4CF1632F.5030004@epimorphics.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org If the code was developed in part by HP employees "on the clock" then a CCLA or SGA must be obtained from HP. If the code was developed in part by others, then those other persons need to sign a SGA covering their contributions. All the current developers need to sign an ICLA. If any of the current developers work for HP, then a CCLA from HP naming these developers would be a good idea as well. Craig On Nov 27, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Well, this is going to depend on how the copyrights work, I guess. If > it's clear that HP owns the copyright (all the HP people were working > for hire), then a CCLA from HP will cover it. However, IANTL. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org