Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68841 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 11:54:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 11:54:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 27380 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 11:54:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27129 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 11:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27121 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 11:54:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:54:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rafal.rusin@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.41] (HELO mail-ww0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:54:22 +0000 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so597166wwi.0 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:54:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cVYbPgFytMH6h/1PFona+G4+PDrkVtJgcqq0tA7k6DM=; b=a/ulS5Ntdlttgb2LQShgVlxu13q4MbsN8i8nRPZkTEzMn8fmU1ONoeEX+jGd1LQIXO xcwJrrcOi7X7K+RK/iFb5b19HXArSq72Jmxo36uImKW8zdHeP6mH5h57Nx9BevCMKH3n CiUsd8Fk4LcRHNXZNpVZInCaR4c4mRjA90yX4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HMWCo/gAVy9uTVFGlMtujYsI+9TpgePEQr+SpnPFRDOOCe1y3F5v03tp5ZZ1DFqjwK +M/PmaJHE83pWLYj/kedp0TNpjEzvA62SoOy+5PYHOnEPK/lbpkGxFQwrgGQ+cTUlqey Omphfb2rpr36DqSEbQ1B/PM54vKjenLBIwhBk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.82.197 with SMTP id o47mr3866101wee.45.1287834841271; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:54:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.133.96 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:54:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <370873.58924.qm@web54404.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <4C9F86FD.5060409@thoughtcraft.com> <4CA0BBDA.2090907@rowe-clan.net> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:54:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HISE community needs to grow From: Rafal Rusin To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Glen Daniels Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, HISE community has voted new committer (+5 votes from PPMC members, +1 vote from Incubator PMC members). So it seems like formally person is not committer. What can I do about it n= ow? On 27 September 2010 18:29, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:44 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. > wrote: > > +1 > > To more or less quote Joe S on this subject ... > > The purpose of the incubation process is to support and supervise the > podling *behaving like a PMC*. > > > > Even though PPMC actions are formally nonbinding (with the exception > of the current experiment), we want to encourage PPMCs to behave as if > their votes counted, and indeed we hope to hardly ever be presented, > as an incubator PMC, with a PPMC vote that we need to contradict. The > situation at HISE is not good. Not just because a oversight might have > left them with a one-person private list, but because, as a result, > that podling PMC has most assuredly *not* been acting like a PMC in > the area of recruiting and evaluating new contributors. I am happy to > see that Glen is going to fix all this up, and I am left wondering if > there are any other podlings with comparable problems. > > >> On 9/27/2010 2:16 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>> >>> But you're right that those votes have no formal value. >> >> I would disagree, if there were later discussion by the graduated projec= t >> (now consisting mostly of former PPMC folks), as a PMC chair I'd look ba= ck >> at the decision by the committee participants, not so much as the mentor= / >> supervisory votes. =C2=A0In terms of the long view of project history, t= hose >> votes have a critical value. >> >> And as a mentor, extraordinary circumstances would be needed for me to v= ote >> against the PPMC's direction - if something is wrong, I'm going to cajol= e >> an ASF-appropriate vote/discussion in the PPMC before the IPMC intervene= s! >> Forced-overrides already indicate a disfunctional/not-ready-to-graduate >> podling. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --=20 Regards, Rafa=C5=82 Rusin http://rrusin.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org