Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38680 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2010 16:30:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2010 16:30:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 74252 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2010 16:30:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74083 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2010 16:30:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74075 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2010 16:30:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:30:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:30:16 +0000 Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so3543305bwz.6 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:29:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KbB4BCAiDP7TzuXzM95EvN08d1HYRdM4vzyjZHPy8uc=; b=FTNEbI6LaXwAyI7uSMMcCiTyjlODlVZ3zxHB1x2Z2AepRmgWusapk9UuRhaa26H2GL GOsRogrIqBtM6UalxAR0E+wHLD1LtxW5WHkQ4MrnAI4YFrEh/w1h1JIXlwIRP9L74O7R OzC97jWgj6m2hfGtMjQf0Tyds4b/3dsPShcaI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=f+Kdz//SCpmzI9/x/mMZAejkBPIWf8ni8T6tqB+/EY73CttrTPaFynRkrLeiU6uWEM GLDQktbBE/HA6Zb+zdWZZVjC5vm7eLMPrqYTpKpv2cYWh3/d3hKN0ddFZeJ4+1Cf1IH3 nJwNTHQbV/D2IXZzyul+OiPz/Kp3sfV5zvo9g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.126.223 with SMTP id d31mr5537563bks.146.1285604993783; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.79.4 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:29:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CA0BBDA.2090907@rowe-clan.net> References: <370873.58924.qm@web54404.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <4C9F86FD.5060409@thoughtcraft.com> <4CA0BBDA.2090907@rowe-clan.net> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:29:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HISE community needs to grow From: Benson Margulies To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:44 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: +1 To more or less quote Joe S on this subject ... The purpose of the incubation process is to support and supervise the podling *behaving like a PMC*. Even though PPMC actions are formally nonbinding (with the exception of the current experiment), we want to encourage PPMCs to behave as if their votes counted, and indeed we hope to hardly ever be presented, as an incubator PMC, with a PPMC vote that we need to contradict. The situation at HISE is not good. Not just because a oversight might have left them with a one-person private list, but because, as a result, that podling PMC has most assuredly *not* been acting like a PMC in the area of recruiting and evaluating new contributors. I am happy to see that Glen is going to fix all this up, and I am left wondering if there are any other podlings with comparable problems. > On 9/27/2010 2:16 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> >> But you're right that those votes have no formal value. > > I would disagree, if there were later discussion by the graduated project > (now consisting mostly of former PPMC folks), as a PMC chair I'd look bac= k > at the decision by the committee participants, not so much as the mentor/ > supervisory votes. =C2=A0In terms of the long view of project history, th= ose > votes have a critical value. > > And as a mentor, extraordinary circumstances would be needed for me to vo= te > against the PPMC's direction - if something is wrong, I'm going to cajole > an ASF-appropriate vote/discussion in the PPMC before the IPMC intervenes= ! > Forced-overrides already indicate a disfunctional/not-ready-to-graduate > podling. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org