Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44706 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2010 11:33:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Sep 2010 11:33:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 30939 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2010 11:33:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30280 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2010 11:33:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30272 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2010 11:33:54 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:33:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dkhaywood@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:33:48 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so6202181iwn.6 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:33:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=23T/7gHyd04iQTVOKBZLArrv7RLeKYmUH2Vr48GsCT8=; b=JaCEen8akToUMPZ6Ci8biNfzgNaW376m+dn/Z7DNSMTHU+YBCh4TsBqgloAgzorPd0 0dIwUDX2al2Ey/rZFK6i7y0R89S2mmc4m+eDvLd1BbEZu6rfuBMiNGDJHjWKyZo+gCEr lVbr4800lZZC+r1gjanUfOGAtrBRLcyBT70Yg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=AdmLIAJ/I4t174BHibTfpWLKznUoSfMp32GvwPcw7/qzspdrrI10e4ZjmsYlI+qAOz msU+kFYZY2OYGqiJee435qkaRl0DNaN50jLFMpyqkZjUfWkUP99W5IDMDDJe1VN1VS6r gC2mh0PT/qyP72EBKvcLpIn1B39w0m+15Jikg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.130.145 with SMTP id t17mr1502013ibs.144.1283945607482; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: dkhaywood@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.191.146 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 04:33:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C873855.5030102@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:33:27 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: XknOrGbIV91rFLRHFypI7zpbHkY Message-ID: Subject: Re: No dev-, user- lists for small podlings (was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Kitty to Enter the Incubator) From: dan haywood To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6461636d84dbc048fbde14b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6461636d84dbc048fbde14b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 8 September 2010 12:16, James Carman wrote: > Isn't Isis a different bird though? It has been around for a long time and > is likely to actually have existing users > It has some, but not enough to be sustainable. Hence entry into the incubator to build both its user and developer communities. I think that for the foreseeable any new users we attract are likely to be early adopters, with a better than average chance of getting interested in contributing. One of the internal milestones for us ought to be when we get to the point that we vote it would be beneficial to split off a -user from -dev... that would be an indicator that we have enough "just users", and are moving into the early majority stage. There's another thing here too.. activity on the mailing list (even if its just the devs exchanging ideas) will give would-be users a sense that interesting things are happening. In contrast, a very quiet users list (which I think it would be) would be a turn-off. So my vote is just a dev mailnig list for now. > > On Sep 8, 2010 7:04 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote: > > Well, we could neglect to tell anyone about the user list until we need > it. > > > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Dan Haywood wrote: > > > >> Isis mentors: > >> Given we're in the same situation and are still being bootstrapped, > should > >> we follow this advice, ie start off with a combined mailing list for > -dev > >> and -user? > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> On 08/09/2010 08:10, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks >>>> >wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> ... > >>>>> *Mailing Lists* > >>>>> > >>>>> kitty-dev > >>>>> kitty-commits > >>>>> kitty-user > >>>>> > >>>>> Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the > >>>> community across dev/user does not make sense. You want to keep the > users > >>>> and developers on the same mailing list until one starts to overwhelm > the > >>>> other. By partitioning the lists too early, you risk never reaching > >>>> "critical mass" on *either* mailing list. > >>>> > >>> This is actually great advice, and I wish we'd done this with a couple > >>> of podlings that are currently too small to graduate. > >>> > >>> In retrospect empire-db and etch really could have done without the > >>> user- list IMO. > >>> > >>> Martijn > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > >> > --0016e6461636d84dbc048fbde14b--