Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99443 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2010 07:17:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2010 07:17:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 20685 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2010 07:17:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19931 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2010 07:16:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19890 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2010 07:16:55 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:16:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.38.61] (HELO web50307.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (206.190.38.61) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:16:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 12722 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Sep 2010 07:16:11 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283411771; bh=sDhEsCXkIbP/BNx/6pzfrRJNnc4lOdcSZwVdl02dHE0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=A6DAqev2NWgX/BqkC8V02fk8RES5O+Cx1fPHtj7Z8LLEcS2lUYRHK0XQMmSL+nuBYkLOoseHGJHuv0iYsI2pOmLXSzk9fuRDL9mUJjs87Pubnjp/fCE6YiAZJbv+KHHr8WBo42aZzeaFNyFKk/hXAZuuURSPuF8/YW6TwXM1VDE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=W5gzX+eWAmSDyjlL5okSZZfd+IZWRaOXpP4BTVHPQ+BfM0RFJ02C6R5YcsHMiRjVizmAeoyUrdQvP7BCVjvokoIq2YgUmly5gafYjnaEL3yzrzhff1JAYcqcC6vefPch+TodnQ6jp/u3ww+NXLXxY0vGV0J4q8+Y5ef1i0wkZ6g=; Message-ID: <403815.11134.qm@web50307.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: HbslujAVM1nF6M4cTnNfRpldWBycUF0Tl7N8VcVUOpObRuq ayQMTkorbmZ1VTQI434LeKcRRl2gjTxZXC8xxmT80EEZtgUgb02TbhNo.4YE 1yXATBymtV4etmc3oW50E2k7p1T3zq.JDXgZg1aZ1T8HHU15KWz0kLHY5a4J 9jk6WKMzIPUO1Q0NmhAE3h1HtIV.4zMz6cA4afie63Koy.vjoPFzgfeyAV4q Qjxfs.XnsHSrMiuuO6xoL2tH7gOUHEl.3l3xyT08SIYTp.AuXWHp3dv2utzZ XcMBAqA5KTY4fzQU4G8AAr2V9q31M7ufUq67rQvjCSlwvHghWJCmxs3L3X8v .jYXtLgigawAGAzJteC5IjrIVhlc- Received: from [78.1.116.117] by web50307.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:16:11 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 00:16:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: Name change from "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Framework" To: general@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Here's a non-abstract one: - Apache Data (Source?) Connectors? Perhaps "Data (Source)" would make it clear what this is about. Otis ----- Original Message ---- > From: Benson Margulies > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Mon, August 30, 2010 1:23:35 PM > Subject: Re: Name change from "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache >Connectors Framework" > > It seems to me that the pivotal problem here is the word connector. On > the one hand, it could mean almost anything to almost anyone. On the > other hand, it has a specific denotation in the vicinity of httpd. > Everything at Apache is in the vicinity of httpd. > > I'd offer the following 'made-up' options, all following Apache: > > - manifold (many connections) > - omnivore (eats anything) > - rapunzel (spins straw into gold) > - diogenes (seeking for something) > - lantern (ditto) > - helium (fuel for Solr) > > The whole question of brand management strikes me as interesting: is > it, in fact, the job of the incubator PMC to groom the Apache branding > portfolio by guiding new projects towards better names? Is that in our > charter, or should we, as Chris suggests, defer to someone else for > problems in this area. > > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: > > Guys, > > > > If I may: since we're discussing marks, why not post to trademarks@ and ask >Shane and crew to weigh in? Maybe you have already, but if so, I haven't seen >that discussion mentioned over here on general@incubator. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > > > On 8/30/10 10:03 AM, "Grant Ignersoll" wrote: > > > > > > > > On Aug 27, 2010, at 12:15 PM, David Jencks wrote: > >> To try to illustrate my thinking rather than push a name down your >throat... > >> Open ConnectorFramework/OpenConnectorFramework/OpenCF OK, since you've >added a branding word. Not ideal since the purpose appears overly broad > >> Content Connector Framework/ContentConnectorFramework/CCF OK, since you've >clarified the scope. Not ideal since has no branding word. > >> OpenContentConnectorFramework/OpenCCF better since it clarifies the scope >and includes a branding word. > > > > So, the word "open" somehow alleviates your concern? I don't get that. If >your objection is that it comes across as being _the_ Apache connector library, >then how does "Open" modulate that? It's still the Apache Open Connector >Framework. It's still descriptive and still implies it's the one. Besides, >it's the ASF, isn't "Open" implied/redundant? We would never have the Apache >Closed Connector Framework, right? > > > > Likewise, the word Content implies the same "only" status, albeit here I >will give you that it distinguishes it from Tomcat Connector somewhat, although >the Tomcat Connector is just that, the Tomcat connector. However, I still >don't buy that it is a "branding" word. Content is pretty much meaningless. > Everything is content. I have no doubt that we could write a plugin for ACF >that connected to Tomcat and got Content out of it. Heck, we already do. It's >called a web crawler. > > > > So, that leaves us, in my mind w/ the option of some made up name or we >stick w/ ACF. I'm all for a made up one if someone comes up with one, I just >don't know what it is and no one in the community seems to have one either. > ACF fits and the community likes it. It's not unprecedented at the ASF and I >don't think it is confusing with Tomcat Connector. > > > > At any rate, the community would like some resolution. Should I just call >an official vote on ACF and if it loses then we will go back to the drawing >board? > > > > -Grant > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > Senior Computer Scientist > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > > Email: Chris.Mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org