incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Kitty to Enter the Incubator
Date Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:15:30 GMT
Just to clarify: I'm assuming you're saying "+1 to the proposal",
rather than to my comment. Correct?

And to clarify for myself: I have no opinion on the proposal itself. I
timed out after "Java" and the next few buzzwords. Thankfully, this
proposal didn't say "framework" or I may have timed out after the
first :-P ... my comments were focused on the community aspects around
mailing list management, and successfully growing a lively and
sustainable critical mass.

Cheers,
-g

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 02:06, Pid <pid@pidster.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Small point: if a Mentor must be a Member, I can't be one, because I'm not.
>
>
> p
>
> On 08/09/2010 16:00, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
>> +1 (Notbinding)
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks <matthew@matthewsacks.com>wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>
>>>> *Mailing Lists*
>>>>
>>>> kitty-dev
>>>> kitty-commits
>>>> kitty-user
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the
>>> community across dev/user does not make sense. You want to keep the users
>>> and developers on the same mailing list until one starts to overwhelm the
>>> other. By partitioning the lists too early, you risk never reaching
>>> "critical mass" on *either* mailing list.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -g
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message