incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes
Date Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:04:26 GMT
James can I interpret your statement that this would rather be a -0 or -0.1? Stating that there
is no veto but that you personally don't like it ;)

LieGrue,
strub

--- On Thu, 9/9/10, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:

> From: James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com>
> Subject: Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, September 9, 2010, 7:17 PM
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Greg
> Stein <gstein@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > As I said, I haven't followed it. I meant if the -1
> was a veto. If the
> > IPMC was vetoing a podling's choices on stuff like
> this. If you're
> > only using a vote as a preference/opinion marker, then
> sure...
> > definitely no problems with that!
> >
> 
> The vote was stated to be a majority-rules vote, so my -1
> was merely
> an indication of my opinion about the name.  I
> normally wouldn't get
> into the podling's business (I don't troll their lists),
> but they did
> ask for the votes on the general list.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 


      

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message