Return-Path: 
 <general-return-25816-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 22031 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2010 10:55:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2010 10:55:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 36389 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 10:55:03 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 35484 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 10:55:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:general-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 35314 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2010 10:54:59 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:54:59 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.216.47] (HELO mail-qw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:54:51 +0000
Received: by qwg8 with SMTP id 8so8301096qwg.6
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 03:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=sn+fZ97EqKRJoUg7LYuNqlTBmQm4CdBxvqWZoe1/3s4=;
        b=lYA1zibDBHbqn38UrbyuM+QF2ilfh6RFLLLSpRQwuHpg9sLpduELpCwvbHS1/NzsGG
         fLwoGgxMnA6bPwmM5x9JqdDnscxIfDLEeLESl7dihH1GLKKC0yyLLhpLysdsIN4IHuXO
         VZErJIQfaEpx/GUvLGGjl187NOXf7rUlrPkvY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=tRIy6vtnksCfKjf4gkBe8xonPAONbu7QMXfccXDHvPUOtWVMKPO9Wmc6SHoEGMPlUi
         Aoz4bR3RTTjO7ij/RitDjWqyD/Yju579cyxeFhA5sXDzq66THgdq/Uxe6781SfBuxNvV
         wHi4p+2uAr6/sJe3dASlrOy+gYcoQC4Ff/cC8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.234.4 with SMTP id ka4mr8205651qcb.12.1281437670189; Tue,
	10 Aug 2010 03:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.213.70 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 03:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimkacw=U+v4Pp7AT1UxcayVhP5Owyav4euBGye6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimkacw=U+v4Pp7AT1UxcayVhP5Owyav4euBGye6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:54:30 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTin2GEA8cMftqWQ2AC6Y+pHEngjS8hNkGDoxi_By@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Future of RAT
From: Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com>
To: general-incubator <general@incubator.apache.org>,
 rat-dev@incubator.apache.org,
	Apache Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Forgot one possible issue: Currently, RAT has its own mailing lists,
which would be unusual for Commons. My personal choice would be to
leave this as it is, but that's of course also subject to discussion.

Jochen


On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
<jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having just published a release of Apache RAT with the "-incubating"
> label, I'd though it is time to discuss the future of RAT. RAT is an
> incubator project since 18 months. It is not an overly busy project:
> The occasional feature request, which is handled, a bug report from
> time to time, and so on. OTOH, it definitely lives: People are
> interested and, what's more, it is very widely adopted by all Java
> projects I am aware of and perhaps even by a few non-Java projects. If
> there will ever be a migration to a new license like ASL 3 or a
> another change of the header policy, then RAT will likely play a very
> important part in the process. Even now, the RAT report is carefully
> studied as part of every release vote. (Funnily, RAT is very rarely
> used to inspect itself, because so far I didn't find a possibility to
> run a previous version of the RAT Maven plugin as part of a build. In
> fact, RAT is the only project I am aware of, which doesn't publish a
> RAT report. :-)
>
> IMO, RAT could very well leave the incubator. It's 10 or so committers
> [1] are all part of an organization called ASF since years, so you
> might question the diversity, but I don't believe anyone will actually
> do that. ;-) The source code has been developed under ASL and by
> Apache committers right from the start, so licensing was never an
> issue.
>
> The question is: What's the target? RAT is way too small for an
> independent project. And I cannot imagine anybody of the current
> committers writing board reports. To me, a Rat TLP is no option. So we
> have the second possibility: Put it under the hat of another TLP. The
> only one that comes to my mind is the Apache Commons project.
>
> But Commons would be an excellent choice: Most, or even all of the RAT
> committers are Commons committers as well. Commons was one of the
> drivers for integration of RAT into every release build. I admit that
> I wouldn't like to change the package name or the Maven group ID
> again, but either Commons developers could accept that exception from
> the rule or I'd force myself to do the required changes.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Jochen
>
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/rat/team-list.html
>



-- 
I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org