Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61124 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2010 10:44:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2010 10:44:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 55633 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2010 10:44:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54427 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2010 10:44:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54391 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2010 10:44:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:44:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of williamstw@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.175] (HELO mail-gy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.160.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:44:42 +0000 Received: by gya6 with SMTP id 6so2621034gya.6 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 03:44:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=l+zdHJ0Z79JUtQbyVYkCCgT8IPFixq1woHaipYeJzhg=; b=w1NMBHiKMkwMn1YSNMqooiledfQ0TokGhomh63JGLsSFzNI6po9RJVfaDzCKCjwhIF 9Q47oBiwCjcd0i2QzllUiA3u4LK0Rna/hQ5wHCZfjkoatBSIMxNrz9dJdOfopEgs9eez Q4a1WJKTTg+hI59zwx7VzJxgyAKUtWF5ycD4I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WPwDFz0m4z1+thRjRV8dckDbmgi3Lh1n+KvzGFXG4Nmdjl+leMutbsuKWDpeux1irQ WFV4QTd3Drd1zvWnm3ABhFD8W2Gm/XkORqsx+qmsXHVnMhbadGdYBLXh0KPmOZ17am7Q 4ABIurNlQX/R4MW8dd8d9x7pn8HpUgOPAoCMU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.185.4 with SMTP id i4mr1621184ybf.302.1283251460937; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 03:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.140.13 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 03:44:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C7CD95E.5050402@gmail.com> References: <4C73FD6A.10009@gmail.com> <4C7CD95E.5050402@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:44:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Isis From: Tim Williams To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: dan@haywood-associates.co.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Dan Haywood wrote: > =A0On 30/08/2010 07:26, Tim Williams wrote: >> >> Your proposal caused me to poke around the NO site and the first forum >> topic I came upon[1] had someone providing a [simple] patch. =A0This has >> me curious about the code provenance. =A0Assuming this isn't the only >> one, could you say something about getting clearance from outside >> contributors? =A0At least, it seems to me that it could be slightly more >> complicated than the two parties you mention above. > > Just to update this thread... there have been very few patches historical= ly. > =A0Indeed, we've searched through our email archives (back to 2002), thro= ugh > the SVN commit logs, and through the current codebase for any comments, a= nd > found only 1 one-liner from 2008, and the three patches in 2010 all from = the > same user (one of which was the patch you quoted). > > In addition, we have three contributors/committers who have made changes. > > What we're doing is contacting the guy who gave us these patches, and > getting a formal ok from the existing contributors/committers; when I hav= e > this I'll update the proposal. Hi Dan, that's great, you can just update your proposal to acknowledge this and then solve it during incubation. I think it's important to identify these things prior to incubation but you can work it while you're incubating [and, obviously, prior to any release]... --tim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org