Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gredbug@gmail.com designates
 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=NfIQQuxctiACytbhhzXgJeES9OYIF+HY+YDY4wqfb+a8DA+uXU/vVB71tPH21vTyV1
         1seoJm5SC+T1HJJ7RT9Lb/5+OFRYn9NaeBSmDGNpm3WUyyG0XIvbiOGXAd21unWGgnnv
         yAvfgiZ4EoCNGv7zUg2bHuVCkoKyQRtFdhXds=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <974721.3581.qm@web54401.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
References: <974721.3581.qm@web54401.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:20:58 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=WebJzmDj53RC9pvPj9RLk1wUX3xe2SBYuGrBZ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: an experiment
From: Greg Reddin <gredbug@gmail.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wro=
te:
> The first idea should be fairly straightforward: that for
> the projects I participate in (so far thrift and sis), that
> the IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making process
> for voting in new committers: basically rolling back the clock
> to May 1, 2007 on guides/ppmc.html.
>
> The second idea is more controversial: to hold IPMC votes to
> admit all significant committers to those projects to the IPMC
> itself. =A0The purpose of this concept is to allow those who
> best know the codebase to provide IPMC oversight over it,
> especially as it pertains to releases.

Just to pile on, as a member of the SIS podling, I'm +1 to both of these id=
eas.

Greg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org