Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29217 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 17:44:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 17:44:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 59456 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 17:44:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59269 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 17:44:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59261 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2010 17:44:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:44:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.49.132] (HELO web54402.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (206.190.49.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:44:30 +0000 Received: (qmail 46882 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Aug 2010 17:44:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1281980648; bh=j1IO3dbxy1DhBpTL8l97XIW7QpZJy3RkdMUZ9PvWrws=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qbUsOu+YtquzrbZbQrOlnI7qumpW+84z9I986oyCjhNAje/eXcraBPD89yuReUbxxRLv31NdSPDnLC1HSwVG8qWh0HbEyP472Cti8JQZrT16AwHYRkqj0eIvXWFZzqt8dU0J+hrlyk91gz0Y/WwFZQTuxclrXjeTid7dOcl4XBY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0iZsAULcBbdE6Vy3+nczsgctORPedf30VFBt8FrMorRKKFdPK4X3/1u1OiPveODj9/chSIDKaJ6Rt4dX2QySJIh22fCaPDK573uFzid89pxJuHuiCE0dmqyP9HyU9BNJvzgi4q98bSWNAAN05shhIENk5IdPPX8yu8pl1OmLkXE=; Message-ID: <940588.41745.qm@web54402.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: td2G5VQVM1lkoa84qveV3lCvZAeCP2Oqv25fCVE2R.3a4Di j2roX1OwnskHEaLW1V8c85XiqwyvliGe9hozfZQ0wvyx3OQY424GImexD_px 8FIXJG7zVvcnTsoykszMly9lNq.MaCgndXYW0sVqf2wYo44p5T0QCY6ZVtfG xjU9bX1On2Exh_bwivi1Be44ApoQiSRM9le6KrCcq3FSfg9K0vR8nkk7LjG. 2k_0fwOQLmw35U46B0OCqjWvIvBEzpXIzXruIj8v0ru5wdug5KAGMla9RPYp Yc11Bt74p_LY- Received: from [99.135.28.65] by web54402.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:44:08 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/459 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:44:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Joe Schaefer Subject: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC To: general@incubator.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have come to the realization that I'm not going to convince Noel to see things my way any time soon, so I'd like to now ask for a formal majority consensus vote on relaxed rules for the 3 aforementioned projects. Specifically, for thrift, sis, and esme, I wish to remove the current rule that requires 3 votes from IPMC members to approve a vote on a new committer, effectively delegating the decision to the PPMC. Additionally the pre-ack would be removed, but no other process changes are anticipated. Here's my +1. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org