Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36429 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2010 18:32:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Aug 2010 18:32:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 24905 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2010 18:32:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 24624 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2010 18:32:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 24616 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2010 18:32:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:32:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.49.138] (HELO web54408.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (206.190.49.138) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:32:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 18078 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Aug 2010 18:31:54 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1281637914; bh=zM2UFouDKPOMtODdXmQogGoJ7gLSsTslzNmjyXYnnrU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kb+UaqI2rIkgj/aeLq6Ac367Fd8prVSv9wkp3VqFopCEQlEVqGwitICTO4M4CUaGnIf0CjY3/xiMq21vr80+PHMVlQ+8trGbHz01nI1n7AEqK71e7q6NSKDBLvJbxulDGvCPh75FKHzlBBYQ2MPapZ1PZG8z61c5lT1A8Gg5Xyc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=38nzJUjHnP2xOn7dSyyHvwAQ6WqvM5foLnOVwQmuz1+e3zX5CoLjnI9lML7TXGcf1ArwrXebT5wzPGvHUL/Hk+GQ2VnYVcBDRDMbGfi03VtT/dUE6gRirZQWfvWMNBhqjXfI9TlUkcRjKELz8oscMHgUfP1SLJyQ8rQ8OfJ4Zz8=; Message-ID: <459372.16276.qm@web54408.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 3.05HPUVM1l0bl7eWtrh7EBHqlXXll0fBSyUcCv2Nma38Yn Tv2qCKXrkBPP3PMWTBornwf6tnzuTqw7UmOxgUbAfyAHHwaDUn3CZ2hccWXU .bXtg3tlFdwHbueo0RAkjjny7ZDssWwjGlb2uk5s7unITuXOrS.Oe37M1ITQ IRN89oi751EnfNUHx4NdeHDrcyiUmsCsu7dIljiX0rT9gqZiH6aEGK34MKqk fZJsLkvsDoCK3pKfSU6Dhy7rCCOuCRy_PNFeOjIdCV9M.KzCqMQFobss7ThF yJMx8DlMXQr4q0QphD7qHYUt5U2gYX7MdAY2hwwUZZRGNqz1wz1Bidz294zQ FRPC1Uy3olp8SUA-- Received: from [99.135.28.65] by web54408.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:31:54 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/459 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <974721.3581.qm@web54401.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:31:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Joe Schaefer Subject: Re: an experiment To: general@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ----- Original Message ---- > From: Craig L Russell > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 2:21:44 PM > Subject: Re: an experiment > > > On Aug 11, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > The first idea should be fairly straightforward: that for > > the projects I participate in (so far thrift and sis), that > > the IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making process > > for voting in new committers: basically rolling back the clock > > to May 1, 2007 on guides/ppmc.html. > > > Before we set ourselves up for disappointment based on > unrealistic expectations, this proposal is fairly modest. > Here's the current process for getting new committers into an incubating >project: > > 1. Identify candidates > 2. Discuss candidates on podling-private > 3. Agree that candidate should be a committer > 4. Vote on podling-private > 5. Wait for everyone's vote > 6. Inform incubator PMC of results of vote > 7. Vote in incubator PMC if not all three mentors have voted > 8. Invite committer > 9. Send ICLA > 10. Wait for ICLA registration > 11. Send root request for committer > 12. Wait for root to create account > 13. Update asf authorization file for new account > 14. Done > > All this proposal does is to eliminate step 7 in the case where the Mentors >are AWOL. As Justin points out there is also a pre-notification step in the current process that would also go away, but yes that is the gist of it. > > That said, I support the idea behind this modest proposal, > and just need to see the details (several modifications > have been proposed). Infra also needs to support this > proposal, as the main reason for item 7 is to get root to > recognize that the incubator PMC has taken official action > (three votes in favor of a new committer) which has been > an infrastructure requirement (also part of the details). As the infra person who has created each and every account in this org over the past 4 years, I think I can safely speak to infra's interest in this issue. root@ only looks that the account request has been cc'd to all the proper lists and expects those lists to ensure proper procedure has been followed for the request. root@ maintains a few days delay between receipt of an acct request and action on it in order to allow for effective oversight. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org