incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: an experiment
Date Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:19:53 GMT

On Aug 11, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:

> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> 
>> From: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 5:07:33 PM
>> Subject: Re: an experiment
>> 
>> +1 to IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making
>> process for voting in new  committers (one question,
>> would they need an ACK from IPMC - similar to how  PMC's
>> send a note to the board for an ACK for new pmc members)?
> 
> That certainly sounds like a reasonable thing to do, sure.
> 

+1

>> In the  2nd question, "significant committers", are we asking
>> mentors to identify such  candidates for addition to IPMC, 
>> especially release managers for example? if  so, +1 for that
>> as well.
> 

I was also curious as to the mechanism for determining "significance"--I would be satisfied
with mentors' recommendation as outlined by dims.  I wonder if there should be some limit/function
to determine the number of non-Member representatives a given podling may have on the IPMC.

-Matt

> Absolutely, especially RM's that have gotten into the habit
> of running RAT themselves.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message