incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Reddin <>
Subject Re: an experiment
Date Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:20:58 GMT
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Joe Schaefer <> wrote:
> The first idea should be fairly straightforward: that for
> the projects I participate in (so far thrift and sis), that
> the IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making process
> for voting in new committers: basically rolling back the clock
> to May 1, 2007 on guides/ppmc.html.
> The second idea is more controversial: to hold IPMC votes to
> admit all significant committers to those projects to the IPMC
> itself.  The purpose of this concept is to allow those who
> best know the codebase to provide IPMC oversight over it,
> especially as it pertains to releases.

Just to pile on, as a member of the SIS podling, I'm +1 to both of these ideas.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message