incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: an experiment
Date Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:07:50 GMT
Joe,

Can they not +1 it either? :) seriously, it would be a bit hard to track 2 levels of ipmc
members

-- dims



On 08/11/2010 07:24 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>
>> From: Davanum Srinivas<davanum@gmail.com>
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 6:28:17 PM
>> Subject: Re: an experiment
>>
>> Ant,
>>
>> My personal opinion (and i am hoping!) was that such individuals
>> from ppmc's who end up in ipmc would help build bridges
>> between podlings and  will help get lessons learned (when any ppmc
>> has issues/problems/roadblocks)  back to their ppmc.
>> This is one area where i've seen people struggle, folks  from
>> different projects learning the same lessons the hard way.
>
> Good point.
>
>> I am not  too worried about "binding" vote one podling ppmc
>> member have over another  podling's release. the "binding" is
>> for me a legal thing (as in we need 3  binding ipmc votes for a release).
>
> I think ant is more concerned about graduation votes.  We
> could simply write a new rule that podling committers on
> the IPMC brought in through my initiative MUST ABSTAIN from
> graduation votes.  I don't think the board would be the
> least bit upset if we did that.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message