incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <>
Subject Re: River status
Date Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:56:32 GMT
Skimming over the river lists over the past year, I'd have
to say that my only real concern is that their last release
took them a full month or so to execute.  Nobody in the community
really participated, and tho eventually some +1's did get
thrown in it isn't clear that those people had actually
done any evaluation work to justify their vote.

I would like to see them release again, with a smoother process
of course.  I have 2 river accounts to go and create, so I don't
have any concerns about their ability to attract new people to
the project.

ISTR some chronic concerns about river's overall health, and it
appears that Peter Firmstone does most of the committing there.
Let's see how these new people integrate themselves into the

----- Original Message ----
> From: Benson Margulies <>
> To:
> Sent: Fri, August 27, 2010 11:17:07 AM
> Subject: River status
> There's a very satisfying buzz of activity at River these days. My
> fellow  mentors would like to see more actual commits, but I'm  an
> optimist.
> This leads me to open this thread, more as a general  exploration of
> the PMC's view of the exit process than anything  else.
> Before I joined the incubator PMC, I saw sporadic conversation  on
> members@ about 'failure to launch --' projects that just seem to  hang
> around the incubator for a long time. They don't collapse, and  they
> don't exit. From the looks of it, River might well have been a  subject
> of that conversation for quite some time.
> One possible view is  that a project should be graduated, aggressively,
> when it has a community  which has a demonstrated willingness and
> ability to model Apache behavior. IP  management, good community
> management on the mailing lists, and, at least, a  small core of active
> participants.
> Other views look like they call for  a larger hubbub of activity and commits.
> I offer the following trial  balloon: The ASF has invested a whole lot
> of time and energy in River to  date. As of right now, they look better
> than some TLP's I've met. Killing  them makes no sense to me, and
> keeping them 'on probation' has its own  issues, since we all know that
> many people in the outside world treat  podlings as having a sort of
> black smudge on their batting average. if they  keep this up for a
> month or so, let's graduate them and move  on.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To  unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For  additional commands, e-mail:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message