Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16064 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2010 05:23:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2010 05:23:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 37178 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2010 05:23:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36482 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2010 05:23:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36472 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2010 05:23:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:23:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-px0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:23:06 +0000 Received: by pxi5 with SMTP id 5so7467690pxi.12 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:22:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/TR6s7Lk2HBhKZD8Vo+F5KhFJGwdPOjiIvKpdmcOzXg=; b=dOkWonFXvItUpGBP6iuedTDBVMMqlWcjf6kmcTfaJXrhgdHDI5se0DE4VJbBAJmX9X u0HEzymCWTr2GaBJJDK6n07URS160jndf4K3R2fd+nxmpF+RRr808M4Iz70kDbzVzC87 HKrlbAWxu1M911bUT+h6gI37JuATrIYTxvzfY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=bO5DzDkHP0y4ptejnIu1mfqrVQqD7suNOKRzB7vY7zD2YmE5Y/uk6Pgat46Q0R8H+j WKo9YPoTT33hKhjuvbCh7wSYQ+h8lpIBl7kXRarWXnrupvLUf4FB2JUKPuWKDs0opckb BQccUyCrfbLXPZBx0Rw3MHFaLLg3EhnVZIxXU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.120.3 with SMTP id s3mr4976486wfc.35.1265692965361; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:22:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:22:45 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 30c83084d2610a51 Message-ID: <5c902b9e1002082122k716c9655kbcf3e526349c092a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Source code dumps via JIRA? From: Justin Erenkrantz To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org For OODT, we think we want to import the prior history of the project into the podling via a Subversion dump file. However, in: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump it says: --- In either case, the code to be imported should be attached to a JIRA and then imported. It is recommended that the previous version control system is tagged so that the imported version is precisely known. A public record MUST be made of the code imported. If the import is not attached to JIRA then it MUST be committed to version control. --- I can understand the rationale for having a public record, but I'm not seeing the reasoning for JIRA. Can someone please shed some light on this? Is this really reflective of actual best practices? As a counter-example, I'd believe providing a URL to the dump (or uploading it to people.a.o) and providing a SHA checksum via email (PGP-signed?) would be sufficient for our purposes. -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org