From general-return-24555-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Sat Jan 23 22:48:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99749 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2010 22:47:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2010 22:47:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 75929 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2010 22:47:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75713 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2010 22:47:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75703 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2010 22:47:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:47:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eaepstein@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.220 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.220] (HELO mail-ew0-f220.google.com) (209.85.219.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:47:48 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so1848711ewy.0 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:47:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sQtF9jv2qG/wSUv7MbZQs8zrhoArsQ1AINNHZgZQG5w=; b=XpZPtst1R14F696WVC12mhHRCGRKLZNP2Okn0E6Ur57fLe44FkPDXCqFbtyZ4wECuM ZNy6xgqofyVQuZj24qTL3XnHVVDNxvgliapVe7ReyG0KAxXwHbiK4mosLkH6V5qgLpK6 lSmI2jJW754uU8S6DDouTig91fkJKQjrG6LK0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fS/YOZUUSPOSGCUnTRKznsnljMY9EylzFBOF5LBNuqPJoCgXOA+Z3CSIm237cEtiea pEv7csKtNG8patDkf6y0nDadt+tUi+sYT7I0DO5+cdrCDnAujfgZK0eP9jD3ND80cwxz Cg3EHJgebqjc8OYX4w0QDD9WzEUj3t4cylUKw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.148 with SMTP id w20mr1756517wee.138.1264286846934; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:47:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B5B3398.7000005@bristowhill.com> References: <4B4DEC57.1020506@schor.com> <510143ac1001171748x22430082r246c3a4a55ea9429@mail.gmail.com> <4B5B3398.7000005@bristowhill.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:47:26 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0-rc9 From: Eddie Epstein To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Jean, Just noting that uimacpp does include rat reports, just poorly named :( In http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC9/uimacpp/ are 5 xxx-report.txt files that correspond to the 5 uimacpp download packages in the release. And although not identical to the previous release, uimacpp has only minor changes to existing components. Regards, Eddie On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote: > since I reviewed the earliest uima releases I went ahead and reviewed this > one. > > I did not take the time to unpack files and examine them because I was > convinced by early release rounds that the UIMA project knows how to do this > reliably. > > I did focus on the rat reports that were included and on the email thread. > --I encountered only one minor confusion: uimacpp did not include a rat > report, but Marshall's post to the podling vote thread mentioned that > uimacpp is identical to the previous release. [1] Nothing needs to be done > here, Marshall, I'm just noting this in case any other mentors start > reviewing this. > > based on my review I give this release a +1. > > -jean > > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/osrpk5skilchagi6 > > Jukka Zitting wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: >> >>> >>> Please cast your vote! >>> >> >> My +1 from uima-dev@ stands here as well. >> >> Others, please review and vote! The release is pretty complex so it's >> a bit of work to review it, but it would be great if at least two >> other IPMC members could spare some time on this. >> >> BR, >> >> Jukka Zitting >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org