incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean T. Anderson" <...@bristowhill.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0-rc9
Date Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:43:24 GMT
Eddie Epstein wrote:
> Hi, sure.
> The unapproved licenses for each package are:
>
> Linux source - 17 unknown:
>   7 - regression and sample test data
>   6 - auto generated files (gnumake and JNI header)
>   1 - NOTICE file for binary package (with suffix)
>   1 - README file for binary package (with suffix)
>   1 - doxygen html template
>   1 - gdb init file for testing
>
> Windows source - 46 unknown:
>   35 - Microsoft devenv build control files (vcproj and sln)
>   7 - regression and sample test data
>   1 - NOTICE file for binary package (with suffix)
>   1 - README file for binary package (with suffix)
>   1 - doxygen html template
>   1 - JNI auto gen header
>
> Linux 32-bit and 64-bit binary - 377 unknown for each
>   259 - doxygen output files
>   108 - ICU redistributable headers
>   7 - xercesc redistributable headers
>   1 - APR redistributable header
>   1 - sample test data
>   1 - gdb init file
>
> Windows binary - 462 unknown
>   333 - doxygen output files
>   104 - ICU redistributable headers
>   13 - Microsoft devenv build files (vcporj and sln)
>   10 - xercesc redistributable headers
>   1 - APR redistributable header
>   1 - sample test data
>
> Thanks for digging into the UIMA release!
> Eddie
>
>   

Thanks for chasing those all down, Eddie.

I don't spot any problems, so my +1 stands.

 -jean

> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Jean T. Anderson <jta@bristowhill.com> wrote:
>   
>> Eddie Epstein wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Jean,
>>>
>>> Just noting that uimacpp does include rat reports, just poorly named :(
>>>
>>> In
>>> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC9/uimacpp/
>>> are 5 xxx-report.txt files that correspond to the 5 uimacpp download
>>> packages
>>> in the release.
>>>
>>> And although not identical to the previous release, uimacpp has only minor
>>> changes to existing components.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Eddie
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> Thanks for the clarification, Eddie!
>>
>> Since you're indicating that there were some minor changes, I went ahead and
>> took a look at the uimacpp rat reports. All files have  "Unknown Licenses"
>> reported, and some files have hundreds. Since uimacpp was already approved
>> for release before, I'm sure that all is in order, but could you just
>> refresh our memory about those unknown license messages? I bet they might
>> have to do with auto-generated files, but it would be good to confirm.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> -jean
>>
>>     
>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Jean T. Anderson <jta@bristowhill.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> since I reviewed the earliest uima releases I went ahead and reviewed
>>>> this
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> I did not take the time to unpack files and examine them because I was
>>>> convinced by early release rounds that the UIMA project knows how to do
>>>> this
>>>> reliably.
>>>>
>>>> I did focus on the rat reports that were included and on the email
>>>> thread.
>>>> --I encountered only one minor confusion: uimacpp did not include a rat
>>>> report, but Marshall's post to the podling vote thread mentioned that
>>>> uimacpp is identical to the previous release. [1] Nothing needs to be
>>>> done
>>>> here, Marshall, I'm just noting this in case any other mentors start
>>>> reviewing this.
>>>>
>>>> based on my review I give this release a +1.
>>>>
>>>> -jean
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/osrpk5skilchagi6
>>>>
>>>> Jukka Zitting wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Please cast your vote!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> My +1 from uima-dev@ stands here as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Others, please review and vote! The release is pretty complex so it's
>>>>> a bit of work to review it, but it would be great if at least two
>>>>> other IPMC members could spare some time on this.
>>>>>
>>>>> BR,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jukka Zitting
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>>     
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message