Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73910 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2009 20:52:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2009 20:52:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 10748 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2009 20:52:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10533 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2009 20:52:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10523 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2009 20:52:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:52:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.112.202.4] (HELO mail.devtech.com) (66.112.202.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:52:09 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MessageIsInfected: false Received: from mail.devtech.com. ([66.112.202.4]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.1-dev) with SMTP ID 788 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:51:48 -0500 (EST) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement Interoperability Services (CMIS) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:51:47 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 > I'm not sure if having two podlings implementing CMIS is a good idea. The Incubator is not really in the business of pre-selecting winners. If t= here are two communities that want to incubate, those are two separate item= s. If there is a reason to see if they can merge, I am all for it. Mergin= g can mean more critical mass and a more diverse community. But there is a= difference between encouraging and facilitating a merger, and forcing one = or choosing a "winner". =09--- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org