Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <4B1D5FCF.7010408@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:04:31 -0800
From: Doug Cutting <cutting@apache.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: How documentation != code,
 and how to "do" policy (was: Re: Publishing
 api docs for Subversion)
References: <30b2aef60912050245l38421fe2ia3c5f4a929cd49b0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B1D5188.9020700@apache.org>
 <55afdc850912071135y772441d0n18b4e26201071cd5@mail.gmail.com>
 <4B1D5DC5.3090502@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B1D5DC5.3090502@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Doug Cutting wrote:
> > In the absence of specific policy then *objections* are out of order
> I have not objected to anything.

Forgive me.  I did in fact use the verb "object" in a prior message:

>        * Do you object to publishing non-released documentation on the
>          project Web pages?
> 
> I object to posting these outside of a clearly-marked developer portion of the project's web site.

I didn't mean this as a veto or formal objection. I was rather using a 
parallel construction to better make clear my view.  I meant this in the 
informal sense that I would argue this is not the best approach.

Sorry for any misunderstanding.

Doug

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org