Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51937 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2009 16:06:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Dec 2009 16:06:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 51859 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2009 16:06:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51650 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2009 16:06:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37696 invoked by uid 99); 11 Dec 2009 16:00:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sf@nuxeo.com designates 209.85.219.210 as permitted sender) Cc: "Incubator-General" Message-Id: <2FC40E43-73EE-4C25-9024-3C94348C4D69@nuxeo.com> From: Stefane Fermigier To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <56C255F88C54014E92512ED3E7848F940467943A@MUCXGC1.opentext.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement Interoperability Services (CMIS) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:59:35 +0100 References: <646a352f0912100700q5bc45268vebaa75cbf56c7269@mail.gmail.com> <56C255F88C54014E92512ED3E7848F940467943A@MUCXGC1.opentext.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 11, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Florian M=FCller wrote: > Hi Stefane, > > I'm not sure I get your point. If OpenCMIS would become a top level =20= > subproject within Chemistry (which is what Florent suggested) then =20 > those two topics would still remain. It would be even worse: =20 > Chemistry would then have two client APIs which would be really =20 > confusing. > > The only way to overcome this is to merge the OpenCMIS code into the =20= > Chemistry code base. But the technical approaches of the projects =20 > are so different that this might not work - at least not in the =20 > short term. > > Or is your message that you don't want OpenCMIS code at all on Apache? My message is that I don't think we should have two different, =20 competing CMIS client APIs in Apache, specially if they start being =20 developed at the roughly the same time. S. -- Stefane Fermigier, Founder and Chairman, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) Web: http://www.nuxeo.com/ - Tel: +33 1 40 33 79 87 New: follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sfermigier --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org