On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Doug Cutting <cutting@apache.org> wrote:
> Paul Querna wrote:
>>
>> httpd and apr have published doxygen of their trunks periodically,
>> they aren't based on any release.
>
> Were these published these on the official public website or in the dev/
> section?
>
> I was under the impression that released documentation should be treated
> similarly to released code. The convention I've used is that stuff that's
> in trunk, stuff that's intended to be included in releases, is only
> published after release. Other pages on the website that are not included
> in releases, e.g., the project's home page, are clearly published without a
> release vote.
<http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/>
Which is linked from the sidebar everywhere, and on the docs page:
<http://httpd.apache.org/docs/>
> In particular, I think it's a bad practice to publish automatic nightly
> builds on the official website of content that's otherwise the subject of
> release votes. Is it forbidden? Perhaps not, but it's not a practice we
> should encourage in the incubator. Often documentation includes code. Do
> we want to publish that code without a vote?
httpd docs don't include code, dunno what projects do :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|