Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3205 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2009 03:27:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2009 03:27:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 87558 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2009 03:27:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 87341 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2009 03:27:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 87331 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2009 03:27:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:27:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gstein@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.155] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:27:23 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so731683fga.0 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:27:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SjRqaQvyvUycRlIf/7jvFqgpk7pz4WSyVYl7h9XEYkk=; b=XzA3IuhShr9Y4c1iLxJYVGnjqDASvEJEuldccAS0Avt2oMgKJWNquM9cqM60MZlUya U8ncbvHx5QylXQzaQFdnsPnZ7VLmlUarwEec6WPaUwGeuky1l27HikSdiLCJd7ktz+9R H9m3epaXKYfSF9n2n+DM569IZKthl9ovm+8FM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dmpYv4tPLUzvObtLO2dYNwYFHElTaj4Z1XXtL64drnZp++5ZMw6zIw3KT8xXkRnyJn z5EOPYxdnz1Z1zhHn89OOA20YNemt02L0dtByClJo7xRSx3oQiMuVVasDiamELxXCfkF 9lwvVX/mTknSbdh0H4irAhzONm5U/jrVzil9Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.87.70.37 with SMTP id x37mr1707691fgk.36.1257996422904; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:27:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <6cca3db30911041212na34324dp16d978c52ce9d2a1@mail.gmail.com> <4AF84CD6.10409@collab.net> <26280942.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AF97FD3.2080301@collab.net> <26286015.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AF99B81.5070406@xbc.nu> <26299895.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:27:02 -0500 Message-ID: <6cca3db30911111927g48217fffp4758a6347ed38d51@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Serf vs Neon (was Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion) From: Greg Stein To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:48, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Is this topic really appropriate for incubator general? I'm having trouble following along with all the noise. At the root, it is a discussion about LGPL dependencies in an incoming podling. Neon is LGPL. Serf is ALv2. Both are optional, though you really want to choose one for a broadly-useful svn build. In the past, Neon was the default. For 1.7, serf is going to be the default, although a few people in the community are wary of that choice. HTH, -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org