Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65102 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 15:56:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 15:56:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 86955 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 15:56:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86755 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 15:56:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86740 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 15:56:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:56:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gstein@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.153 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.153] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:56:09 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so1224167fga.0 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:55:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jakayL3n8BJb3TDvta3hRsPAxEjiH7tGdmNehPGA0s8=; b=L1DibFxb46igI0PeN6f299EYkUj83U/p/5RBUTlhDCsKZlHFDCzoyCmA6psaObENUn rhm5B2nmi2hqV2wWgrHDN5lbj7HNfGobyCXcJL+KBE4k85noQ91mDQF7AjhN/W1AISES rpYnh3ZzgPvId9relxzZXejpxJgdB9BX+eBSo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H8j1b3ecN8JbuW2N1UeGNZsoKzEAfSJ393IgxXbAKqQIKyJC+HUdSQqHha6JoIaFZG NGsj4/QWA7mCCKDoTSe9pg32mCE5OMWWPtZZHJoyvVyvEk8NUKZLzywU60qAh9CFqJR+ oqavex80sFkrvb7G/5z9w6dG0jCGp6YKe2FRQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.13.37 with SMTP id 37mr235985fgm.58.1257868549016; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:55:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4AF92B65.3020409@rowe-clan.net> References: <6cca3db30911081725m55f979d0p50c2bc9b97b04cc5@mail.gmail.com> <918312fe0911090627g3c315ebp695c6432a34a2f18@mail.gmail.com> <6cca3db30911090649o3b0ed3d5lacd3ec26ac892a9a@mail.gmail.com> <591FDBA1-1546-413E-A7C1-8659DF752BB1@objectstyle.org> <6cca3db30911090723y3d72c8b0nee1d21a5218f1b7d@mail.gmail.com> <4AF92B65.3020409@rowe-clan.net> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:55:48 -0500 Message-ID: <6cca3db30911100755gd004fecw254e8e3f64236102@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion) From: Greg Stein To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 03:59, William A. Rowe, Jr. w= rote: > Greg Stein wrote: >> >> Yup. And I'll note that that "limbo" you describe has been an issue >> with the Board for a long while now. That is why the Board instructed >> the IPMC to request all podlings to list two items in their reports: >> >> 1) when did you arrive? >> 2) what is left? >> >> Specifically to focus the podling (and the IPMC) on the question of >> "WHY are you still in the Incubator?" >> >> Podlings should be shepherded *out* rather than held *in*. > > Hmmm... here you go again. =A0Do you really believe there's a mentor here > who doesn't want to be 'done' with their task at hand, offering up a > functioning project for graduation? =A0Mentors -do- exactly this, which > is why your rants continue to read as disingenuous and insulting. I'm not talking about mentors' desire to do this. I'm talking about the structures that appear to be in place which work *against* incubation and graduation. And if you want to call a rant against meaningless constraints and bureaucracy "insulting", then I'm okay with that. > We are glad the board has such confidence that the Incubator is producing > effect meritocracies that collaborate effectively. =A0If your's is not th= e > minority opinion, there is a much larger 'Insanity' thread to begin, whic= h > starts with [VOTE] and ends in "Dissolve Incubator?" My point above was the Board, at least in the past(*), has *not* been happy about the average duration. Go poll the Board today, if you'd like. AFAIK, the Board has never expressed a lack of confidence in the Incubator, other than duration. Cheers, -g (*) see "Incubator Reports" sent to Noel, IPMC, and board@ on Oct 12, 2006 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org