Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91991 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2009 07:45:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2009 07:45:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 15176 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2009 07:45:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 15002 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2009 07:45:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14991 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2009 07:45:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:45:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.41] (HELO mail-pw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.160.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:45:14 +0000 Received: by pwj1 with SMTP id 1so1516786pwj.20 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:44:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=th98xSDZiMIA1v8r/Xzy8x2qqMAwRn+8qTlRNY0b+Qo=; b=RIy2mIN2d+dHHuvBPLPwdAMJq2HM1Sd/ysjnXL8hOh4Lv488oqbOCU1YRN7QLk14zh D9o+2LdHj3zwxGn6Yf9W2RcsfZB44mhf1x2HSgHkb1JUWCCmI16bV5WC7pAbNcaS3twJ IqrLB00TH1q8MGGpdeGHRYsfn7Rcv9MJtIsag= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dzYuwhQoo3je1Sj8dNFc0aMotgCUchL0uenK/4EVwATPVht4Gtlkb+e5Qq8JXrHSLF CMusyvl6eV9LRQC/nloz1vaVqlSmMihVBnMcig6R652Lc/sbZ9+vPQHoMpBB4XZYnJqI Fkwn1+jvF3at5vm3CnK5d9qEv/16EoAA5jces= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.151.8 with SMTP id y8mr282362wfd.65.1258011893839; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:44:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6cca3db30911111916o69a9557ar7ad4b3eea2f0d9de@mail.gmail.com> References: <6cca3db30911111916o69a9557ar7ad4b3eea2f0d9de@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:44:53 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 629e6d0d29a5ce66 Message-ID: <5c902b9e0911112344k3fe7bbe5y1fd62a12e81e9ef6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Review-Then-Commit From: Justin Erenkrantz To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > I've participated in both styles of development. RTC is *stifling*. I > would never want to see that in any Apache community for its routine > development (branch releases are another matter). > > My opinion is that it is very unfortunate that Cassandra feels that it > cannot trust its developers with a CTR model, and pushes RTC as its > methodology. The group-mind smashes down the creativity of the > individual, excited, free-thinking contributor. +1. I think part of Cassandra's problem is that they do releases directly from trunk and don't have a 'stable' et al branch. As I understood Owen's "Intro to Hadoop" talk at AC, Hadoop has changed their methodology lately to CTR and found it to work far better. (Duh.) -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org