Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6179 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2009 00:14:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2009 00:14:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 61992 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 00:14:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 61791 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 00:14:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 61781 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 00:14:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:14:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.28] (HELO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:14:03 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2357BEB3C for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:13:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:13:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=R0XS3cnpW2ku2pthspKd5g4k5aU=; b=ZgDkrnKsfI6iygGpdB2EDmCjIQ1GAtkrMx8z/NAT/8iBactygI8TSA+qcYmF2yqFtjH3VNreYVzz1khNeVAyylZ8F77XPM4g+TO2WFBy+Sw7oSw2C+BwQLMKGinDv0T6uHNLa4dkjHrD6TrqwtgkL7eT2oNHaJeKh1Nzksju+wc= X-Sasl-enc: vj43cWKGv/dZy5F9JGJj5hE7SXr2v5UqWFCvz/RAmb8F 1257466421 Received: from localhost (dsl-41-216.wholesaledsl.com.au [125.168.41.216]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AC0C3534D for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:13:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:13:53 +1100 From: David Crossley To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion Message-ID: <20091106001353.GA23908@igg.indexgeo.com.au> References: <6cca3db30911041212na34324dp16d978c52ce9d2a1@mail.gmail.com> <20091105052745.GC22503@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <6cca3db30911050726s6289e1b5qd2d3e04e449590ea@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6cca3db30911050726s6289e1b5qd2d3e04e449590ea@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Greg Stein wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > [snip] > ... I think there is going to be some concern that > we're "forcing/rushing" the process, but I believe the speed is simply > a function of the awesome match in ideals. Agreed. > > Perhaps this Vote phase should run for a while. > > (I am thinking about setting precedents for other > > incubation proposals.) > > I was planning a standard 72-hour vote, concluding Saturday. Do you > feel that it should be extended further? If it was any other group, then i would be more concerned. Because Subversion has such a synergy with ASF, then okay. > > By the way, it would probably be good to list your initial > > committers in the proposal, as we suggest for other proponents. > > That adds it to these mail list archives. > > The proposal included the list by reference > (http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/COMMITTERS). Do you think it > best to be explicit, and list them in this thread? In general i do think it best to be explicit. We ask others to. Because you refer to a file in yesterday's SVN with explicit line numbers, then i am happier. -David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org